Goods received not invoiced (GRNI) refers to goods received without a corresponding invoice. For a site-to-finance review, start with verified receipts up to a fixed cutoff and identify the portion not covered by an invoice that has been found and matched. Separate a missing invoice from an existing but unlinked one, and leave future deliveries out. This is an operational investigation snapshot; finance makes accounting decisions separately.
1. Start with the receipt, not the order balance
At a period end, a purchase order may remain open even though materials are already on site. The narrower question here is: which verified receipts lack a matching invoice at a particular cutoff? A PO number alone is insufficient because one order can involve several deliveries and invoices. Each worklist entry should also identify the PO line and receiving document.
Microsoft Business Central documents a GRNI overview based on purchase lines separately from its vendor-payables analysis. That distinction also helps a manual review: an invoice not matched to a receipt is different from a recorded invoice awaiting payment. The source system’s definitions still determine what its own report includes.
Further reading: Microsoft: GRNI overview and purchasing analysis
2. Keep both the cutoff and the extraction time
Put the cutoff, time zone and included projects at the top of the worklist. Separately retain when the list was extracted. The physical receipt date, data-entry date and invoice-arrival date can differ. If an earlier receipt was entered after the cutoff, flag it for review rather than suggesting it was known when the original snapshot was prepared.
For each receipt, record the vendor, project, PO and line, document number, item, unit and verified quantity. Search for invoices using document and line references, not just similar amounts. If finance already holds the invoice but it is unlinked, mark “invoice located — matching under review” with its reference instead of treating it as never received.
3. Worked example: 35 panels to investigate, not 90
This fictional example uses one PO for 120 panels in the same unit, with no cancellations, returns or advance billing. The cutoff is September 18 at 6:00 p.m. in the jobsite’s time zone. Invoice quantities are matched only to the specified receipts. This illustrates a process, not customer data or a built-in Novapro report.
- By the cutoff, 40 + 25 = 65 panels were received. Of these, 30 have matching invoice coverage and 35 require investigation.
- The delivery remainder at that cutoff is 120 − 65 = 55. It is not part of the uninvoiced-receipt cohort because those panels had not yet arrived.
- Calculating 120 − 30 = 90 mixes 55 unreceived panels with 35 already received. It therefore does not answer this worklist’s question.
| Receipt and date | Received quantity | Invoice coverage at cutoff | Inclusion and next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| R301 · 17/09 | 40 | 30 of 40 matched to an invoice | Included: investigate invoice coverage for 10; assign an owner and follow-up date. |
| R302 · 18/09 | 25 | No invoice located by cutoff | Included: investigate 25. Record any later invoice as a subsequent update. |
| R303 · 19/09 | 15 | Receipt occurred after cutoff | Excluded from the September 18 snapshot; review in the next worklist. |
4. Separate exceptions before totaling
Give each line a clear status: invoice not located, invoice located but matching under review, partial receipt, or disputed receipt data. If the received quantity is unverified, mark it unknown and ask the field owner to resolve it. Zero should be a verified quantity, not a substitute for missing information.
Vendor returns, credits, advance billing and unit conversions require separate review. Do not automatically apply the example’s simple subtraction to them. Check whether a return already reduced the source quantity and whether a credit refers to the same document, so an adjustment is not counted twice. Total only lines with compatible definitions and units.
5. Hand off ownership and preserve later updates
Send finance a list with links or references to the PO and receipt, the result of the invoice search, the reason for review and the person responsible for a response. The field team verifies receipt, purchasing investigates vendor documents, and finance checks what it already holds. Set a follow-up date for each line, not just a deadline to send the file.
Suppose invoice I502 arrives on September 20 for all 25 panels in R302. Retain the original cutoff entry and add the invoice-arrival date, reference and matching result. The current follow-up list can mark the investigation resolved after verification. Do not silently rewrite the September 18 snapshot or count those panels as both uninvoiced and invoice-covered in the same current-status list.
Oracle notes that invoices received or processed between runs, as well as returns, can explain differences in uninvoiced-receipt reporting. Keep the extraction time and the change explaining a difference. Whether and how an accounting entry changes remains part of the company’s finance process.
Further reading: Oracle: uninvoiced receipts and changes between runs
6. Connect the review to the document trail
The related guides below continue the workflow: the open-PO report helps review what still needs attention on an order; three-way matching connects an invoice to the PO and receipts; the invoice-discrepancy guide handles an existing invoice whose quantity or price does not match.
Novapro brings purchase orders and documents into the project context and supports checking how they match. This guide proposes a manual worklist; it does not promise a built-in GRNI report, automated accounting entries or an existing accounting-system integration. In a demo, review a sample document trail without sensitive data and assess how the available workflow fits your team.
Practical checklist
- Cutoff, time zone, extraction time and included projects.
- Vendor, PO and line, receipt, item, unit and verified quantity.
- Invoice-search result, reference if located, and matching status.
- Separation of cutoff receipts, future deliveries and unverified cases.
- Reason for review, owner, next action and follow-up date per line.
- Subsequent invoice or correction recorded without erasing the cutoff snapshot.
In a personalized demo, review the order, receipt and invoice trail in your project context.
Request a document-matching demoFrequently asked questions
Does an unpaid invoice belong in the GRNI worklist?
Not because it is unpaid. This worklist checks whether a matching invoice exists for a receipt. An invoice that has been found and matched but remains unpaid belongs in the payment process, separately from a missing-document investigation.
Does an undelivered PO remainder count as goods received not invoiced?
Not in this receipt worklist: start only with goods verified as received by the cutoff. Keep the undelivered remainder in order follow-up. Review advances and exceptions separately under the appropriate process.
What if an invoice arrives after the cutoff?
Keep the cutoff snapshot and add an update with the invoice-arrival date, number and matched receipts. Update the current investigation status after verification and leave any accounting-entry decision to finance.
Keep reading
Three-Way Matching: Purchase Orders, Delivery Tickets and Invoices →
Invoice vs. Purchase Order Discrepancies: How to Review and Resolve Them →
Open Purchase Order Report: What to Check Before Closing a PO →
